There is no superhero, not even Batman, that is much of a worldwide cultural icon as Superman. Everyone knows who he is, what clothes he wears, and what powers he has. Everyone knows who his girlfriend is, who his best friend is, and where he works. Everyone knows that he fights for truth, justice, and the American way. Everyone except the people who made this movie. I’ll preface this entire column by saying that there will be spoilers so you should stop reading if you care about such things.
I’ll also say that this was actually an okay movie, but it was a horrible Superman movie. It was better than Superman Returns or Superman IV, but that isn’t saying much. I probably liked it about as much as Superman III. And yes I totally understand that Supes III is an 80’s gong show of epic proportions that not even the comedic genius of Richard Pryor could fix (and Robert Vaughn is really trying as fake Lex Luthor). My main issue isn’t that Superman is edgy (although that is lame), but that the film doesn’t adhere to its own rules and logic.
First let’s deal with Superman snapping Zod’s neck. Sharp-eyed fanboys will point out that our buddy Kal-El executed Zod in Superman issue #22 and in Superman II. In the comics the move was controversial, out of character, and kind of stupid. So much so that subsequent writers took Superman into space and had him pretend to be a different hero for a bit while he sorted his stuff out. Cause for Superman killing anybody messes with his head. As for the Superman II movie version of Zod’s death remember that the original director was kicked off the project. So even though Superman lets a depowered and human Zod fall to his death down an icy cravasse in the movie, the original idea was very different. And why? Because Superman always finds another way.
It doesn’t actually bother me that Superman kills Zod because that is this director’s interpretation of the character. In this story he struggles with a choice and chooses to kill to protect humans. The problem that I have is that it ignores the logic that the movie has set up regarding his powers. He has Zod in a headlock and Zod is about to use his heat vision to turn some innocent bystanders into crispy fries. So while Superman could snap Zod’s neck to save the humans he could also fly away with Zod to save the humans. Also if he was so concerned with human life he maybe should have fought Zod in the arctic instead of punching him through a bunch of buildings that fell on people. It is like we are watching an episode of Dragon Ball Z with all the punching through buildings and crushing of innocents. It just seems so out of character for someone who is continually referred to in comics as the Big Blue Boy Scout. And that is the point of Superman. When faced with impossible odds and difficult choices he always chooses the hard path that saves the most life. Otherwise he could just kill everyone he faces. It would save time and taxpayer costs on incarceration fees.
And that seems to be a continual problem with the movie. Each character seems off, and their actions are conflicting or nonsensical. Perry White wants to bury a story about Superman because if Lois is right people will freak out? Wow, solid job as a newsman there Perry. And his nameless assistants were so forgettable that I can’t even tell you their names. I can’t even tell you the names of any Kryptonians save Jor-El, Zod, and Lara. And I should be able to tell you a character’s name. If I have been watching a 2.5 hour movie and can’t remember the name of a character they don’t need to be in the movie. And if you are just adding characters with no personality or motivation of their own you have a problem and a pretty weak script.
All that being said the main cast was very strong, they just didn’t have much of a script to work with. As an audience we really don’t see a reason why Lois and Superman fall for each other. They just kind of meet and then are making out. The entire movie seemed to be an exercise in progressing plot from point A to point Z with very little regard to character progression. Indeed, the dramatis personae seemed to be dragged to the conclusion at the same breakneck speed as the rest of us, and seemed genuinely surprised at the outcome.
As benefits a movie of this magnitude the visuals are spectacular and special effects Oscar worthy. The problem is that we have come to expect such things. Great specials effects are only a baseline requirement for a blockbuster now so at times they fail to impress. The tag line for the 1978 picture was “You will believe a man can fly”. At the time it was game changing to see Superman brought to life on the big screen in that way (previously he had only been in cartoons or on television), but in the last 35 years there have been a few advancements in technology, so seeing a man fly isn’t as impressive anymore.
My final gripe is the lack of acknowledgement of a shared DC universe. Okay I was hoping for some post credits scene where Clark Kent interviews Bruce Wayne or something, but I would have settled for Gotham City being on the news. But I’m not sure that they even mention Metropolis by name, so that might have been too much to ask for. Still if you are trying to set up a JLA movie (and you should be) there really seems to be a missed opportunity here.
I would say that people will get there money’s worth out of Man of Steel, but it really isn’t very good. You’ll be entertained as long as you aren’t a Superman purist, otherwise this movie will be your kryptonite.
He didn’t let Zod fall to his death in Superman II: “In 1984, when Superman II premiered on television, 24 minutes were re-inserted into the film (17 minutes on ABC). Much of the extra footage was directed by Richard Donner. In the ABC-TV version, a U.S. “polar patrol” is shown picking up the three Kryptonians and Lex Luthor at the end of the film. Without this ending, it appears that Superman has let the Kryptonians die, though Superman has a strict code against killing and their deaths aren’t necessary once they are depowered. On the other hand, the theatrical version’s ending implies that Luthor is left stranded at the Fortress of Solitude, leaving the viewer to wonder how he got to prison in Superman IV: The Quest for Peace — that question was answered in the extended versions. The ending of the extended cuts also has Superman, with Lois standing beside him, destroying the Fortress of Solitude.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superman_II
Yes, but in the original theatrical release, and many subsequent televised versions (including the one I saw most recently) he lets them fall to their deaths. That is why I mentioned that the original idea being different, and the original director (Donner) being kicked off the movie. The point is that there has been precedence for Zod being killed.
I still disagree, they fall and you ASSUMED it was to their deaths. No one involved in the film ever stated that the villains were killed, nor did they die in the novelization or the comic version. They were retrieved off camera.
Yes, I did assume that a fall down an icy pit would kill a de-powered Kryptonian. Without showing them later that is what the audience should assume. That is why the changes were made later. What should have been and what was were two different things. The reason the change was made was because someone with sense said “wait, it looks an awful lot like those guys just died”.
No one involved in Man of Steel stated that thousands of people were crushed by buildings but we are shown something to suggest otherwise.
What I’m saying is that changes were not made later, they were shot and just not included in the theatrical release as whoever edited the film didn’t think it was necessary to include the unnecessary scene of carting them away to prison – maybe they thought Luthor’s jokes didn’t work? (although they did decide to add it back in for the tv broadcast when they had more time).
They didn’t go back and shoot new footage for the tv release, they just put stuff left on the cutting room floor that didn’t contradict the story back in.
In Superman IV Luthor gets out of prison, I wonder how he got there? Did the audience assume that Superman left him to freeze to death at the North Pole? That’s where he’s left at the end of the theatrical release of Superman II.
Oh I know what you are saying, but I use the theatrical release of Superman II as a previous example of Superman killing Zod. How the movie was released is how a movie is meant to shown at first. I totally agree with you that it wasn’t meant to be that way. And Luthor being left alive in the arctic isn’t quite as cut and dry as someone falling down a pit, but yes, logically we should assume that he froze to death. And that is why he wasn’t in Superman III.;)
Anthony, I totally agree with you on the new Superman film, as I’ve stated in another post earlier (I think Stephen’s) the movie just went through the ropes, with horrible casting Amy Adams (was she any better than Kate Bosworth in ‘Returns’, to me clones of each other). The director just doesn’t know who Lois is…to me Teri Hatcher was the best Lois Lane ever. Strong, sexy, witty, peppy, and yes…a dark brunette. Get it right. Anyway I digress. Superman thank god is making money…this is the only good news from the movie. Enough fans think that it was good, so I guess my critique doesn’t matter much anyway. I hope they correct the casting and problems in the sequel.
*oops meant scott’s post
Comments are closed.